Top 10 GPS tracker manufacturers to watch in 2026
In telematics, particularly across fleet management and asset tracking, the challenge today is not access to GPS technology, but choosing what truly fits. The market has grown more crowded, regional differences matter more than before, and device relevance increasingly depends on how and where it is used. To bring clarity to this environment, we analyzed a full year of global usage data from the Navixy platform.
The result is a view of GPS device manufacturers shaped by real-world adoption across regions and use cases, intended to serve as a grounded reference for professionals looking ahead to 2026. Let’s get to it.
Key takeaways
- GPS device choice in 2026 is less about market leaders and more about how well hardware fits regional, industry, and operational realities.
- Telematics data is increasingly entering platforms through OEM sources and protocol-level integration, changing the role devices play in modern deployments.
- The next phase of telematics is defined by how platforms work with data across systems, not by tracking hardware alone.
Global top 10 GPS device manufacturers
At a global level, GPS device adoption continues to be shaped by a relatively small group of manufacturers with the scale and consistency to support long-term telematics deployments. At the same time, the way tracking data enters platforms is beginning to shift, reflecting broader changes in integration models and system architecture.
This global top 10 is based on a year of device and data activity across the Navixy platform.
| Rank | Vendor | Most commonly used models |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Teltonika | FMC130, FMB920, FMC920, FMB130, FMB120 |
| 2 | Jimi IoT (Concox) | OB22, GT06N, JM-VL103M, JM-VL02, VL808 |
| 3 | Ruptela | Trace5, FM ECO4 light, HCV5, PRO5, Trace5 NA |
| 4 | Queclink | GV55W, GV300W, GV350MG, GV58LAU, GV75W |
| 5 | Suntech | ST4300, ST310U, ST310U-E, ST300, ST340U |
| 6 | Navixy Generic Protocol* | Data via Navixy Generic Protocol |
| 7 | Ford Pro** | OEM telematics (data comes directly from vehicles) |
| 8 | TopFlyTech | TLP2-SFB, TLW2-12BL, TLW2-2BL, TLD2-LC, TLD2-LCB |
| 9 | iStartek | VT200, VT100, VT200L, VT206, VT200D |
| 10 | TKStar | TK905, TK806, TK915 |
What the global ranking reveals
The upper half of the ranking remains anchored by manufacturers that combine broad portfolios with dependable regional availability. Teltonika and Jimi IoT continue to lead through scale, availability, and reliable performance across common fleet use cases, while Ruptela and Queclink reinforce the importance of predictable device behavior in mature fleet environments.
Suntech’s position reflects its sustained relevance across multiple regions, particularly in deployments that prioritize stability over rapid hardware turnover.
Beyond the top five, the ranking begins to capture deeper shifts in how telematics data reaches platforms. The presence of both the Navixy Generic Protocol and Ford Pro, indicates that a growing share of data now arrives outside traditional aftermarket device paths. This includes protocol-based integrations and native vehicle data streams, especially in newer fleets and more regulated markets.
The remaining manufacturers in the second half of the ranking, such as TopFlyTech, iStartek, and TKStar, represent more focused hardware approaches. These vendors tend to succeed in specific use cases, cost-sensitive deployments, or regionally concentrated markets, rather than through broad, global coverage.
Why Navixy Generic Protocol appears in the ranking*
The Navixy Generic Protocol appears in the global ranking due to the volume of data entering the platform through a unified integration layer rather than through individual branded devices. This includes both data retransmission from external systems and direct use by devices that support the protocol natively.
Although this activity is concentrated in a limited number of large deployments, the resulting data volume places the protocol alongside leading manufacturers in terms of platform usage. Its inclusion highlights a shift toward protocol-level connectivity, as telematics environments become more diverse and less centered on single-vendor hardware.
Top GPS device manufacturers by region
Global rankings provide a useful baseline, but they rarely tell the whole story. Regional markets introduce their own constraints and priorities, shaped by regulation, operating conditions, and cost sensitivity. These factors often shift the balance between manufacturers, elevating vendors that may play a more modest role at a global level.
Top GPS device manufacturers in LATAM
Latin America remains one of the most dynamic telematics markets, driven by large fleet volumes, long vehicle lifecycles, and strong price sensitivity. Reliability and simplicity often outweigh advanced features, while local availability and proven performance in challenging operating conditions play a major part in vendor choice.
| Rank | Vendor | Most commonly used models |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jimi IoT (Concox) | OB22, GT06N, JM-VL103M, JM-VL02, VL808 |
| 2 | Suntech | ST4300, ST310U, ST310U-E, ST300, ST340U |
| 3 | Navixy Generic Protocol* | Data via Navixy Generic Protocol |
| 4 | Micodus | MV720 |
| 5 | Teltonika | FMC130, FMB920, FMC920, FMB130, FMB120 |
Jimi IoT leads in LATAM largely because it is familiar and widely trusted across the region. Its devices are easy to deploy, deliver stable day-to-day operation, and scale well for large fleets, which makes them a common choice across many types of vehicles and use cases.
Suntech holds a strong position for different reasons. Its devices are often selected for stability and long service life. In LATAM markets, where vehicles tend to remain in operation for many years, this reliability is often valued more than frequent hardware updates.
Again, Navixy Generic Protocol appears in the ranking as a result of how tracking data is integrated in the region. Many fleets operate mixed hardware environments or rely on existing third-party systems, using retransmission or protocol-level integration to connect that data to Navixy rather than replacing devices.
Micodus earns its place through a small number of models that match local operational needs, particularly where price and basic functionality matter most. Teltonika, while a global leader, shows a more selective presence in LATAM, typically used in specific projects rather than as a default choice across entire fleets.
Top GPS device manufacturers in EMEA
Europe, the Middle East, and Africa (EMEA) presents a more fragmented telematics environment than many other regions. Regulatory requirements vary widely, certification and documentation matter, and fleets often operate across multiple countries with different expectations around data handling and hardware compliance. As a result, vendor choice here tends to favor predictability, standards alignment, and flexibility in deployment.
| Rank | Vendor | Most commonly used models |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Teltonika | FMC130, FMB920, FMC920, FMB130, FMB120 |
| 2 | Suntech | ST4300, ST310U, ST310U-E, ST300, ST340U |
| 3 | Queclink | GV55W, GV300W, GV350MG, GV58LAU, GV75W |
| 4 | iStartek | VT200, VT100, VT200L, VT206, VT200D |
| 5 | TopFlyTech | TLP2-SFB, TLW2-12BL, TLW2-2BL, TLD2-LC, TLD2-LCB |
Teltonika leads in EMEA largely because it fits well into complex, multi-country deployments. Its devices are widely certified, well documented, and flexible enough to support different fleet setups, which makes them a reliable choice for companies operating across borders.
Suntech remains strong in the region thanks to its stable device behavior and long service life. In many EMEA markets, fleets value consistency and compliance over frequent hardware changes, and Suntech devices are often chosen with that in mind.
Queclink appears high in the ranking because its devices work well in varied and mixed environments. They are commonly used where fleets need flexibility across vehicle types, connectivity options, or operating conditions, without adding unnecessary integration effort.
iStartek and TopFlyTech complete the regional top by serving more focused needs in targeted projects or cost-aware deployments where straightforward integration and predictable performance matter more than broad feature sets.
Top GPS device manufacturers in APAC
The Asia–Pacific region brings together very different telematics markets under one umbrella. It includes both mature fleet environments and fast-growing, cost-sensitive markets. Across this range, several shared priorities stand out: price sensitivity at scale, flexibility across vehicle types, support for long vehicle lifecycles, and the ability to operate reliably in dense cities as well as remote regions.
As a result, device adoption in APAC often favors manufacturers that balance affordability with proven reliability, and that can support large deployments without complex configuration or extra operational effort.
| Rank | Vendor | Most commonly used models |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Teltonika | FMC130, FMB920, FMB140 |
| 2 | Meitrack | T366L, T366G, T355 |
| 3 | Digital Matter | Remora, Bolt2, Remora2 |
| 4 | Jimi IoT (Concox) | JM-LL01, GT06N, JM-VL103M |
| 5 | Coban | TK103, TK306 |
Teltonika and Jimi IoT appear in the APAC ranking for largely the same reasons they lead elsewhere. Their broad portfolios, wide availability, and predictable performance make them natural choices in large and mixed deployments, so their presence here comes as little surprise.
What gives the APAC ranking its distinct shape is the presence of manufacturers that align closely with regional operating realities.
Meitrack occupies a clear position as a volume-driven option. Its devices are commonly used in large deployments where practicality, stable operation, and cost control guide purchasing decisions. In many APAC markets, this balance allows fleets to scale without adding operational complexity.
Digital Matter points to the importance of asset tracking and low-maintenance deployments across the region. Devices such as Remora and Bolt are frequently used for long-term monitoring of remote or non-powered assets, which are common in logistics, infrastructure, and industrial scenarios throughout APAC.
Coban completes the regional picture by addressing the entry-level segment. Its devices remain widely used in basic tracking scenarios, particularly where simplicity, availability, and price take priority over deep integration or advanced functionality.
Trends shaping telematics heading into 2026
Rankings show which manufacturers are being used today. Trends help explain why those choices are changing. Across regions and industries, several shifts stand out, pointing to how telematics platforms, devices, and integrations are evolving beyond traditional tracking.
OEM telematics becomes harder to ignore**
OEM telematics has moved firmly into the mainstream. According to Berg Insight, around 78% of all cars sold worldwide in 2024 were equipped with embedded OEM telematics systems, underlining how factory-built connectivity has become a default rather than an exception.
This growth is reinforced by the scale of hardware shipments. The same Berg Insight estimates that global shipments of OEM telematics hardware reached nearly 68 million units in 2023, alongside continued growth in aftermarket devices, highlighting a dual-layer telematics landscape where embedded and aftermarket solutions coexist.
For telematics platforms, this shift places greater emphasis on working with native vehicle data streams, long-term compatibility with OEM ecosystems, and integration models that extend beyond device installation.
Protocol-level integration gains momentum
As telematics deployments become more heterogeneous, integration is increasingly happening at the system and protocol level rather than through direct device replacement. Industry forecasts underline the scale of this shift. MarketsandMarkets projects that the global automotive telematics market will grow from around $10 billion in 2025 to nearly $16.7 billion by 2032, driven by connected services and data-centric applications.
In this environment, fleets are more likely to extend existing systems and connect data through standardized interfaces. Protocol-level compatibility becomes a structural requirement, enabling platforms to absorb data from mixed hardware environments without forcing costly hardware changes.
Remote vehicle management becomes a baseline expectation
Remote vehicle management capabilities are increasingly treated as standard operational tools. As embedded connectivity expands, fleets expect functions such as remote diagnostics, configuration changes, and vehicle control to be available without additional infrastructure.
Broader mobility research supports this direction. ABI Research forecasts that by 2030, nearly 70% of new passenger vehicles will support SAE Level 2 or higher automation, reflecting deeper integration of connectivity, control systems, and telematics within vehicle architectures.
As vehicles become more software-defined, the ability to manage them remotely becomes less of an advanced feature and more of a baseline operational expectation.
Devices without GPS address specific use cases
Not all telematics deployments depend on continuous location tracking. As platforms mature, more use cases focus on diagnostics, compliance, connectivity, and system control, where positioning plays a secondary role.
The broader expansion of the telematics market supports this diversification. As embedded and cloud-connected systems grow, hardware is increasingly tailored to specific operational functions rather than built around GPS as a default requirement. This trend is particularly visible in stationary assets, controlled environments, and regulated workflows.
Video telematics and AI move toward platform-level integration
Video telematics continues to grow as a distinct segment, but the focus is shifting away from standalone solutions. Fleets increasingly expect video streams and AI-driven insights to integrate directly into core telematics platforms, allowing footage to be analyzed alongside vehicle data, events, and operational workflows.
Rather than treating video as a parallel system, the trend points toward tighter alignment between visual data, telemetry, and decision-making processes.
Working with data beyond devices
As you can see, telematics environments are becoming more complex, and this is changing how platforms work with data. Today, information comes not only from devices, but also from OEM sources, third-party platforms, video systems, and other applications already used in daily operations.
In this context, the challenge is no longer just collecting data. It is about making sense of information that arrives from different systems, in different formats, and at different levels of detail. In Navixy, this data is processed through IoT Logic, where it can be transformed, combined, and used to drive workflows based on real operational conditions.
The same data can then be explored through IoT Query, which allows teams to build flexible reports across mixed data sources, rather than being limited to a single device type or vendor. This makes it possible to analyze operations holistically, even when fleets rely on heterogeneous hardware and external systems.
Beyond reporting, IoT Logic also enables interaction with third-party platforms. Using webhook-based logic, Navixy can trigger actions or pass commands to external systems, turning telematics data into part of an operational loop rather than a static output.
This approach supports the reality highlighted throughout the rankings and trends. Fleets rarely operate in clean, uniform environments. Platforms that can work with data beyond devices are better equipped to support that complexity without forcing costly system or hardware replacement.
Top GPS device manufacturers by industry
Trends and regional differences shape the telematics market, but device choice ultimately depends on how telematics is used in practice. Each industry places different demands on hardware, from scale and reliability to autonomy and integration flexibility.
The industry-based rankings below highlight manufacturers that tend to work best in specific environments, along with examples of device models that fit those needs particularly well.
Commercial fleet and logistics
Commercial fleet and logistics operations run at scale. Vehicles are deployed in large numbers, often across wide areas, and are expected to work with minimal downtime. In this environment, reliability, predictable device behavior, and ease of installation matter more than specialized features. Devices need to work consistently and integrate smoothly into existing fleet systems.
Best-fit manufacturers and devices
- Teltonika FMC130, FMB920
- Jimi IoT (Concox) OB22, GT06N
- Ruptela Trace5, FM ECO4 light
Why these fit
Teltonika works well in large fleets because its devices cover a wide range of logistics use cases and remain available over long periods. Models like FMC130 and FMB920 are commonly used where stability and long-term support are important.
Jimi IoT devices are often chosen when fleets need to deploy hardware quickly and keep installation simple. OB22 and GT06N are widely used in high-volume logistics operations where consistent behavior matters more than customization.
Ruptela fits fleets that require tighter control over device behavior and stable operation over time. Devices like Trace5 are used where reliability and controlled integration are key priorities.
Passenger transport and mobility services
Passenger transport places strong pressure on uptime and safety. Vehicles operate on fixed schedules and under regulatory oversight. Devices are expected to work reliably for long periods and support compliance, monitoring, and service quality without frequent intervention.
Best-fit manufacturers and devices
- Suntech ST4300, ST310U
- Teltonika FMC130
- Queclink GV55W, GV300W
Why these fit
Suntech is widely used in passenger transport because its devices behave consistently and are designed for long service life. Models like ST4300 and ST310U are common in environments where stability is critical.
Teltonika fits operators that manage different vehicle types or require additional control features alongside standard tracking. FMC130 is often used where monitoring and remote actions are part of daily operations.
Queclink devices appear in mobility services that operate across varied conditions or borders. GV55W and GV300W are commonly used where flexible connectivity is needed.
Construction and heavy equipment
Construction and heavy equipment fleets include vehicles, machinery, and stationary assets. Equipment often operates in harsh conditions and may not have a continuous power supply. Devices need to be durable, flexible, and able to operate with limited connectivity. ** Best-fit manufacturers and devices**
- Teltonika FMC130, FMB130
- Queclink GV350MG, GV75W
- TopFlyTech TLW2-12BL, TLD2-LC
Why these fit
Teltonika fits mixed construction fleets where vehicles and equipment need to be managed together. Devices like FMC130 and FMB130 support remote configuration and control, which is useful on active job sites.
Queclink devices are often used where equipment moves between locations and requires adaptable connectivity. Models such as GV350MG and GV75W are common in heavy equipment tracking.
TopFlyTech stands out where durability and autonomy matter most. Its devices are used in situations where access to power or GPS coverage may be limited.
Asset tracking and cargo
Asset and cargo tracking focuses less on vehicles and more on autonomy and battery life. Devices are often deployed on containers, trailers, or valuable assets and expected to operate for long periods without maintenance.
Best-fit manufacturers and devices
- Suntech ST410, ST340U
- TopFlyTech TLW2-12BL, TLW2-2BL
- Meitrack T366L, T366G
Why these fit
Suntech devices are commonly used for cargo and asset tracking because they are designed for long-term operation and stable performance. Models like ST410 are widely used in this segment.
TopFlyTech is often selected for container and cargo tracking where long autonomy and resistance to environmental conditions are required.
Meitrack appears in projects that need basic asset tracking at a lower cost, especially in large or price-sensitive deployments.
Leasing and mixed-use fleets
Leasing and mixed-use fleets change frequently. Vehicles are reassigned, hardware is reused, and customer requirements can vary from one deployment to another. Devices need to be easy to install, remove, and reconfigure, while still working reliably across different vehicle types and use cases.
Best-fit manufacturers and devices
- Jimi IoT (Concox) OB22, GT06N
- Teltonika FMB920, FMC130
- Queclink GV55W, GV300W
Why these fit
Jimi IoT devices are widely used in leasing scenarios because they are simple to deploy and easy to move between vehicles. Models like OB22 and GT06N work well when fleets need to onboard or offboard vehicles quickly, often with minimal configuration.
Teltonika fits mixed-use fleets that require more flexibility or control. Devices such as FMB920 and FMC130 support a wider range of configurations, making them suitable for leasing operations that serve different customers and vehicle types.
Queclink completes the picture by offering devices that work reliably across varied environments and connectivity scenarios. Models like GV55W and GV300W are often used where fleets need a balance between flexibility, stability, and ease of integration without locking into a single use case.
Final word: where telematics is headed
Looking at the data and use cases, telematics is clearly moving away from a one-size-fits-all model. Across global, regional, and industry views, device choice is becoming more contextual. Reliability, ease of deployment, and predictable behavior still matter, but they are increasingly shaped by how data is used rather than by hardware alone. Manufacturers that remain relevant are those that fit into real operating environments, not just those with the longest feature lists.
In parallel, the role of hardware is changing. OEM telematics continues to grow, mixed fleets are becoming the norm, and more data is entering platforms through retransmission and protocol-level integration. This shifts attention from devices alone to how platforms ingest, combine, and work with information coming from many sources. The appearance of approaches like the Navixy Generic Protocol alongside traditional vendors points to this shift, where flexibility and interoperability matter as much as device capability.
This is to say that telematics is beginning to look less like tracking and more like data infrastructure. The growing use of tools like IoT Logic and IoT Query, which we are observing across deployments, illustrates this shift in practical terms, allowing platforms to process incoming data, connect it to workflows, and explore it through flexible queries, regardless of where that data originates. At this point, the future of telematics is less about selecting a single device and more about building systems that can adapt as data sources, industries, and operational needs continue to change.
Contact Navixy to learn more about how it can help adress your particular needs. Keep making informed decisions backed by trends in the GPS technology industry.